Plausible deniability

I do not own a tinfoil hat. I am not sure what one is or why one would want to own one. But I can tell you that there is such a thing as conspiracies and plausible deniability. In a nutshell plausible deniability means that there is no paper trail. Therefore, there is no way to prove that what you say happened happened. On the other hand there are lots of reasons why what you say happened did not happen. If you are a government employee, there are certain things that you learn, certain things that you know due to your work, and certain things that you pick up on the street. Some may be true, some may be partly true and partly false, and some of it might be wrong altogether. But most likely you are not in a position to investigate and prove something one way or another. Therefore, any hypothesis that you put forth becomes a conspiracy theory and you are thought to be the owner of a tinfoil hat. This becomes inevitable if you cannot find a political link that makes the so-called opposition parties oppose each other. Instead, it becomes a bipartisan cover-up.

As yet, I have not found any traction from anyone wanting to know why my situation transpired the way that it did. As a novice whistleblower, I did not understand any of this. I am learning as I go. Since I lost my job to whistleblowing there is nothing to stop me from goading the people responsible for what happened. Meanwhile, they are trying desperately to pretend I don't exist, with some success I might add.